It’s the ‘haze season’… again.

HAZE SG - Yahoo News Singapore

‘Inhale’

‘Exhale’

*cough*

Do you suffer from asthma and find yourself particularly susceptible to pollutants in the air?

Air is all around us and constitutes an ‘implicit condition of existence’ for us humans (Sloterdikj, 2009: 32) because of our reliance on it. The flows of air is invisible and hence not thought about by many. When such flows pertain to polluted air, however, a series of concerns surfaces. This post explores the topic through the horizontal movement of polluted air and scratches upon its biopolitical and geopolitical aspects.

The horizontal movement of polluted air has typically subjected less urbanised areas, downwind of large industrialised formations, victims of polluted air produced from the urban activities (Graham, 2015). Less often, cities like Singapore, downwind of rural areas falls victim to the extreme haze brought about by the Sumatran forest fires in Indonesia during certain periods of the year (see interactive).

The transboundary haze problem has plagued Singapore since the 1970s (Straits Times, 2/10/2015), at times rendered a security threat to the urban milieu when it gets too serious – highlighting the biopolitical and geopolitical aspects of air (Adey, 2013).

nea_psi-a4-posters_fa-22-june-2016-compressed-1

Fig 1: Haze advisory chart (source: NEA, 2017)

Singapore experienced its worst haze episode in 2015 with the PSI exceeding the hazardous mark (Fig 1) – prompting the government to close all primary and secondary schools for a day, and roll out measures catering to the more vulnerable groups (Fig 1) (Straits Times, 2/10/2015). This highlights the pervasive nature of air and how its flow across boundaries affects not just citizens per se, but that its impacts are felt differently by different groups of people (Graham, 2015).

Beyond local complications, the problem of transboundary haze at the regional scale proves difficult to address as well, despite the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution in place (which Indonesia has been criticised for dragging its feet on its ratification – being the final member country to ratify it in 2014) because of sovereignty concerns (CNA, 11/8/2016).

“Don’t assume that just because we have something here, we can just bulldoze (through) anything… That’s still a foreign country and we have to deal with them and we must respect our neighbour’s sovereignty.”

Mr Wan Junaidi, 2016

Geopolitical tensions also arise and mitigation efforts hampered when the same issue is viewed in different regard by different countries – case-in-point, when Indonesia Vice-President chastised other countries for complaining about the haze.

“For 11 months, they enjoyed nice air from Indonesia and they never thanked us. They have suffered because of the haze for one month and they get upset.”

Mr Jusuf Kalla, 2015

ASEAN is aiming for a haze-free region by 2020 but I wonder if that is overly ambitious, given the continued occurrence of the transboundary haze. Indeed, the flows of air (in this case, polluted air) does bring to discussion the often transboundary nature of it, complicating itself with geopolitical considerations.

[456 words]

References:

Adey, P. (2013) ‘Air/ Atmospheres of the Megacity’, Theory Culture & Society, 30, 7/8, 291-308

Graham, S. (2015) ‘Life support: The political ecology of urban air’, City, 19:2-3, 192-215.

Sloterdijk, P. (2009) Terror from the Air; translated by Amy Patton and Steve Corcoran, Los Angeles: Semiotexte

 

Advertisements

Published by

Yi Ming Ang

University College London Undergraduate Year 3 GEOG 3076 Urban Political Ecology Module

One thought on “It’s the ‘haze season’… again.”

  1. Hi Yi Ming!

    This really hit close to home. I guess much of the impacts you described, and your thoughts on them, are relatable to the case of KL, given the transboundary nature of the haze as you mentioned.

    So I thought you would be interested in this paper! (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378014000296) It’s a discourse analysis comparing the different public concerns and perceptions regarding the transboundary haze by Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia (come sing with me to the tune of High School Musical: We are alllll in this togetherrrrrr). One thing I found interesting was the apportion of blame being a subtle and measured political performance among the three countries. One thing you might find interesting, given how you alluded to action via ASEAN, is the low level of confidence in ASEAN that everyone in these 3 countries share with you. You are really not alone on this point here!

    Personally I agree that this is a political prickly bush. Logically it makes sense to define who is ‘at fault’ so certain responsibilities of action could be accorded. But as the paper notes, Malaysia is choosing to be non-confrontational in order not to upset Indonesia. It seems like environmental issues and quality of life is going to take a backseat for a while then.

    Let me know what you think about the paper!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s